"Pithecanthropus? You mean like the Java Man?" I hear you cry.
Yes, indeed. For Smith is described in the third paragraph of the first page as "over six feet tall, and broad in proportion – and, moreover, very ugly…, for his face was astonishingly like a chimpanzee's." The illustration of Smith on the paperback edition shown on this page provides him with a much handsomer countenance than I would imagine Kindon intended. It is his apelike features that inspired a wiseacre copper who had recently attended a lecture entitled "What Evolution Means to YOU!" to bestow upon Smith the anthropological nickname which has stuck ever since. Even the crooks have learned to call him Pithy Smithy.
The very involved plot is far too complex to reduce to a summary of a few sentences or even a few paragraphs. And it's so enjoyable I would be tempted to describe all my favorite characters and go into great detail about the funniest moments and most ingenious plot devices. I better not do that! Suffice it to say that Smith is on a walking holiday in rural English countryside that resembles Dartmoor though the area is completely renamed with fictional towns and landmarks. Over the course of the story rich in incident and adventure he encounters not only a puzzling brutal murder, but an escaped convict, industrial espionage, counterfeiting, revenge, and a crazed inventor of bizarre clockwork devices.
More beautiful map endpapers from E. P. Dutton (click to enlarge) Map artist: Frank Adams |
The cast of characters are far from the types of cliches you would expect from this era. Who could resist the kooky authoress, Cynthia Trebogle, who revisits the murder scene with Smith pontificating on her nutty theory that the murder was committed by "a priest of neolithic or druidical tribe" using a stone axe. Or the irascible Joshua Hubblesby who rhapsodizes on his idea of a real holiday being nothing more than riding his favorite train lines and sleeping. Even the police provide entertainment. Captain Hector Madan, Smith's superior, is a blustery impatient straight man providing many Margaret Dumont moments to Smith's insolent Groucho style quips. The officious younger inspector put in charge of the case is shown up many a time when he doggedly sets his eyes on MacFee as suspect number one while Smith points out he couldn't possibly be the killer due to the timing involved in MacFee's alternate route he took near the murder scene and suggests the inspector do the hike himself as proof.
I won't get my hopes up that any of the libraries in this town has a copy, but the title of the book and name of the author (never heard of him before) has been jotted down on my never-ending wish list.
ReplyDeleteTomCat -
ReplyDeleteThis is such an excellent book that I didn't even know how to write about it without giving away too much. As it is I think I went a little overboard in my praise. Well worth the hunt, I'd say. You really ought to look for a copy of this one. Truly one of the best books of the late 1920s. It's right up there with THE BOLT as one of the little known treasures by a little known writer.
Unless Curt Evans knows something about him there is very little biographical info on Thomas Kindon. I haven't been able to find a thing on the writer. According to Hubin he wrote only one detective novel. Jacques Barzun thinks he only wrote this one book. I'm thinking that the name might be a pseudonym. Another mystery to solve!
Sounds really great John - there is zero chance of my local library having access to a copy and I am definitely going to hunt around and see if I can get an inter-library loan. Sounds like a real hoot - always a joy to read such an enthusiastic review!
ReplyDeleteIf I were a reprint publisher I'd jump on this book in a New York minute, Sergio. Highly deserving of being reissued in order to be enjoyed by those who like me are starving for a darn good detective story of the old fashioned mode.
ReplyDeleteJohn--I'm sure you saw this post on Mystery File a couple of days ago about how hard it is to find copies of mysteries written in the 1940s--
ReplyDeletehttp://mysteryfile.com/blog/?p=16664
I can only imagine that going back another couple of decades makes the search even harder. I'll add this book to my "list," but whether I'll ever find it is another story.
Not at my library! I already checked. I hate when you do this, John. Tempt us with a fabulous book that is not readily available. GAK!!
ReplyDeleteThis is definitely my kind of book and I've written the info down - a lot of good it will do me. But I will try and stay hopeful. :)
I bought my copy of MITM (in the Methuen printing) at a local book sale last year for three or four dollars. Not sure if I'm trying to give people hope that you can luck out with some of these hard-to-find books or just trying to nauseate everyone...
ReplyDeleteNow if I could only find a copy of The Bolt...
You've done it again, John. I'll HAVE to try to find a copy!
ReplyDeleteDarrell -
ReplyDeleteDid you read it? What did you think? I'm eager to know. I still can't believe all the copies of THE BOLT that were available years ago are now gone.
Rick -
If only I *owned* the copy I read I would gladly loan it to you. But it's back at the CPL (literally just returned it) awaiting some lucky Chicago reader.
@John:
ReplyDeleteDidn't you (or Curt) suggest The Bolt to the Rue Morgue Press or Langtail Press? Ever heard back from them if you did?
Yes, that was me. Tom Schantz said he bought a copy. Nothing ever happened after that.
ReplyDeleteConcentrating on winnowing some of the mysteries that have been on my shelves for too long, so I haven't read Murder in the Moor yet although it's currently in my tbr queue...(last ten mysteries I've read were all purchased pre-2010).
ReplyDeleteThe problem you will discover in trying to locate copies in public libraries is, basically, censorship. In Ann Arbor's public library they had all 100 of the Barzun and Taylor's great series of '50 classics of crime fiction' , series 1 (1900-1950) and 2 (1950-1975), they bought them as they came out and I read thru almost every one. By abt 1993, the library started dumping them in their used book sale ( so I bought the majority) because 'some of these stories might offend some people's sensitivities, so we are dumping the lot, rather than taking anyone's word that some, if not most, don't fit that description' words ( to that effect) I was told.. Heck, classics by Hugo, Dumas, Scott , and others were thrown out via the same, small-minded, thinking. Want to check out 'Les Miserables' , one of the (IMO) half-dozen greatest novels ever written, or 'Vanity Fair' ( NOT the magazine!) Which is in the top 20..among others.. don't try Ann Arbor..so your own libraries will avail you naught...Sorry to be the bearer of bad news...that series was SOOOO GOOD..introduced people to MANY mysteries and writers they would never otherwise have considered..
ReplyDeleteI watched a librarian at the main branch of the Chicago Public Library culling the shelves. Her criteria for “dumping” books was the copyright date. If it was prior to 1970 it was pulled for recycling. They don’t even bother offering the books gif sake anymore. Straight to the paper pulping plant. There was no regard for the content or scarcity the book. Though I don’t want to discredit your story I really find it hard to believe that any library would cull books because they might be offensive to readers. It is the antithesis of what libraries stand for. The person who gave you that reason for getting rid of the books frankly sounds like a crackpot not a librarian.
Delete