Willeford is so cunning in how he tells his tale of modern art and the arcane world of reclusive eccentric painters that he completely took me in. He fooled this gullible reader. While reading the lengthy lecture Figueras gives his girlfriend Berenice about the origins of Nihilistic Surrealism I began taking notes on all the styles and painters mentioned. Utterly foreign to me were the names of Willi Büttner and his Scatölögieschul, Belgian brothers Hans & Hal Grimm nor had I ever heard of Nihilistic Surrealism. I dutifully headed to that miracle we know as Google to scour the internet for signs of life among these names and terms. Results? 100% nothing. Turns out all of them sprang from the imagination of the writer. Willeford was so convincing in his presentation of these artists and their various schools of painting I believed they actually existed. The lecture Figueras gives -- peppered with references to well known artists like Miró, Picasso, De Chirico and Man Ray -- is so eruditely told I just accepted all of it as truthful. Part of the con begins before the reader even starts the book. Willeford dedicates the book to Jacques Debierue and gives his birth and death dates followed by a Latin memorial phrase. Of course Debierue is as fictional as the entire novel, but for a brief moment I was completely taken in thinking all of the painters and artists mentioned were real.
US 1st edition (Crown, 1971) |
But there is a one huge surprise in store for Figueras when he finally manages to penetrate the hallowed studio housing Debierue's collection of art. And his discovery of Debierue's secret leads him into more crime and savage violence. The Burnt Orange Heresy makes for some exciting reading both as an excellent example of noir in the art world and a insightful satire of the creation and selling of fine art as the ultimate con game.
* * *
Reading Challenge update: Silver Age Bingo card, space S1 - "Book with a Color in the Title"
I have yet to read anythign by Willeford - I have "Cockfighter" and "The Shark Infested Custard" on the shelf but this sounds even better - thanks as always chum, off to find this one now! I love the movie version of "Miami Blues' but have no idea how faithful it was.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed the movie Miami Blues mostly for its depiction of a crime couple trying their best to be a happy imitation of Ralph and Alice Kramden. Just so very odd. I highly recommend PICK-UP which I read ages ago. I adapted a chunk of that book for a stage production I did about sex scenes in fiction. PICK-UP has one of the most remarkable final sentences in all of cirme fiction. Reading the last sentence changes most reader's assessment of the main character.
DeleteI love art mysteries and though this sounds more violent than I would like, I'll keep an eye out, John. Thanks for the intro. You are always such a font of book information. :) It's really thanks to you and Les over at Classic Mysteries that I've become a Vintage Book Addict. I just wish my I had a second hand bookstore nearby. Heaven.
ReplyDeleteThere's really only one violent scene at the very end, Yvette. Slightly foreshadowed in the narrative but all the same eyebrow raising in its savagery. The bulk of the book is all about the art world and Willeford's obvious critical view of what was happening in the galleries circa late 60s-early 70s.
DeleteYes, the book takes a very nasty, inhumane turn...and the now-culprit has no shame about it!
DeleteI did not know that Willeford wrote anything like this. I will definitely track down a copy. Thanks, John.
ReplyDeleteAnother book to add to the want list, I rapidly running out of space. I'm not familiar with Willeford's work where is the best place to start?
ReplyDeleteWayne.
As I said above PICK-UP is one of his earliest and most impressive books.
DeleteCheers, John.
DeleteWayne.
This was the first book by Willeford I read, and the last. I didn't feel so much tricked as fooled, in the literal meaning, and the plot didn't make me swoon either. My brief description of the book was "somewhat interesting". I think you saw more in it than I.
ReplyDeleteI didn't have to work to find I wrote about in the book. It's all there. I also happen to think that the world of modern art is a big farce and so it was easier for me see not only Figueras' outrageous plan as a con artist's means to a selfish reward, but also that Willeford presents Debierue as a con artist. I think there is the possibility that Debierue never created a single piece of art after the day he decided to dupe the public with that picture frame placed around a crack in a wall. There are clues in the narrative that his legend as a great artist was nothing more than the creation of the critics' imaginations run wild.
DeleteIt was set in my beloved florida. All I need to enjoy a good book.
ReplyDelete