A group of British ex-pats have settled themselves into a cozy unnamed village outside of Accra in the Gold Coast colony of West Africa. Stephenson for some reason sets his story in an unspecified year in the 1950s, but it must be before 1957 when the colony became the independent nation of Ghana. Within the first couple of pages I knew I was probably in for trouble when I noticed that the characters’ names were taken from a box of crayons. Harry and Sally Gray, Jimmy and Heather Brown, Hetty and Tweeny (!) Green, Robert Gold, Dennis and Mona Silver, Mr. and Mrs. Blue... You get the picture. There’s Miss Scarlett, too! Yes, Ann Scarlett with two Ts who instantly made me think that Stephenson was trying to pull off a parody of Clue. Or for Stephenson, I guess, Cluedo is more accurate. No such luck. In fact not one person in the story ever comments on the ridiculousness of everyone having a rainbow array of surnames.
The story begins with a New Year’s Eve party with lots of drinking and dancing and transparent exposition clumsily handled. The cast of characters are introduced in dizzying (but colorful) succession. The women chit chat endlessly about clothes, gossip about characters we never meet, and indulge in other pointless banter. The men practically slap each other on the back while tossing off cocktails and speaking like the worst sort of British stereotypes. "The war" is mentioned repeatedly. I’m guessing they are all WW2 veterans, but no one is ever very specific about which war they are talking about. Only Dennis Silver’s entrance brings any kind of interest and mystery to these opening chapters when he begins an info dump monologue on African witchcraft. This seems to be taken verbatim from the two books Stephenson felt it necessary to acknowledge in the “Author’s Note” that precedes the first chapter. Those books are Sir James George Frazer’s seminal study on symbology, rites and rituals in religion The Golden Bough and Religion and Art in Ashanti by R. S. Rattray. In an offhand comment that concludes an early chapter (not cleverly hidden among the rest of the chit chat) we get the tantalizing tidbit that Sally Gray and Hetty Green look remarkably similar from the back in their striking black gowns. An alarm bell couldn’t have sounded any louder to signal an imminent mistaken identity murder.
Sure enough a day later Sally Gray is found murdered in the locked and barred sitting room of the Green’s jungle bungalow. Entry to the house is only via French windows serving as doors that line a veranda extending alongside the entire perimeter. The veranda is covered with a fine mesh of mosquito netting and all the windows and doors are faced in burglar bars. (see the map below) But the front door is locked from the inside as is the rear entry to the house. Summoned by terrifying screams three men run to the house and break down the door. But it’s too late. Sally has died from a fatal strike to the chest from a tribal bow and arrow. How on earth did the murder use the weapon and escape from a locked and barred house? No holes are found in the netting outside the veranda and the bow is nowhere to be found.
|Plan of the Green's Bungalow (click to enlarge)|
Nothing is made of these names. To a mystery fan like me this was more than troubling. Such an obvious choice is rife for possibility in a detective novel and was completely ignored. Not even a joke mentioned in passing by any of the characters. Nothing! A writer like Ellery Queen for example would have made a choice like this and run with it planting red herrings all over the place related to the surnames, maybe even reserving an entire chapter to what seems like a coincidence but in fact a sinister design. Not so with Stephenson. It must’ve been a case of the writer chuckling privately to himself. I kept rolling my eyes.
In one of the most patronizing parts of the book Finch (the primary detective) talks in Pidgin English to the servants. They also reply in pidgin English making it seem as if the book has been transplanted to the Limehouse district of a Sax Rohmer novel and the Africans transformed into the worst kind of Yellow Peril novel supporting cast. It doesn’t help that all of the Africans refer to all of the European characters as Master or Missy. Sometimes you just can’t overlook this kind of petty racism.
Darkest Death would’ve been a much better book with its promising plot and exotic setting in the hands of a much more talented writer. I can imagine how gasp inducing the finale would have been had this been a John Rhode book or one by Carr or Queen. In the hands of this mediocre writer the locked room mystery is a fizzle with a borderline preposterous solution, the revelation of the murderer comes with a lame forced confession, and the climactic pursuit of the villain on the run leads to the beach and ends in a swimming race with half naked policemen trying their best to prevent a suicide by drowning. Stephenson tacks on a happy ending coda in which our detective heroes raise glasses in a champagne toast commending themselves on a job well done while simultaneously congratulating Stalky Heron for snagging Ann Scarlett as his wife to be.
Well gang, they can't all be winners.
* * *
READING CHALLENGE update: My first book on the Silver Age bingo card. It covers S2 - "Book set anywhere except the US or England"
What a shame this isn't more fun - on the face of it I would normally snap it up in a heartbeat. Ah well, onwards and upwards chum.ReplyDelete
Welcome back from the Land Down Under!Delete
I wanted to like this but it cries out to be lampooned. Really sloppy overall. Just as it gets interesting Stephenson undermines the story with pages of non sequitar dialogue, hackneyed incidents, and just plain bad writing. It's a very schizoid book and an odd reading experience. Plus, the modeling of African servants on Uncle Tom stereotypes in a novel published in 1964 is really hard to believe. But John Gifford, also publisher for Foyle's Thriller Book Club, was not known for picking intellectuals or literary giants.
Yes, one of those reviews where we are warned to avoid. I really appreciate those type reviews, both for the honesty and the savings. Thanks, John. I do like the cover, though.ReplyDelete
How frustrating when a book with great ingredients doesn't live up to its promise. But a fascinating review, all the same.ReplyDelete
I love period murder mysteries set amongst the colonials in Africa. Just this past summer I had a ball reading the three Supt. Vachell mysteries written by a young Elspeth Huxley, all good but MURDER ON SAFARI being the best. The difference, of course, is in the writing. Ms. Huxley was a wonderful writer who spent a good deal of her childhood in Africa and so effortlessly captures the local atmosphere. Pity that this one, with such a promising locked-room murder, is such a mess. Very interesting review, John, nonetheless.ReplyDelete
Hi, Jeff! So nice to have you stop by again. Thanks for the reminder about Elspeth Huxley's mysteries. I have all of them and I've been meaning to read them since I started this blog. Good recommendation to counteract the somewhat bad taste left in my mouth after reading this one. I'll make sure to start on them in February.Delete
Hey John! Sorry that my comments have been scarce of late. Good to know you have the Huxley mysteries. Look forward to hearing what you think about them. I'm quite sure you'll find them far superior to this one, at any rate. Take care!Delete