Someone does that job for Troy. Shortly after she has met Lazlo and seen his exquisite workmanship on an intricately stamped necklace, he is murdered. Troy’s guilty conscience and unethical ways get the better of her. Imagining the worst and thinking that she might actually be thought the killer she stages the scene of the bloody murder to look like a suicide. She flees Lazlo’s studio but not before impulsively stealing the copper plate that made the beautiful design in the silver necklace. All of this occurs in the first two chapters. This is our protagonist? Knight seems to be writing a Patricia Highsmith novel with a love mad female version of Tom Ripley, a woman who cares for no one really but herself.
Bracelet designed by Taxco silversmith Hector Aguilar (circa 1940s) |
The tone and language of The Blue Horse of Taxco (1947) is completely different than the Elisha Macomber (her best known series detective) novels in Knight’s early writing period. It’s darker, not at all lighthearted, and fueled with the illogical passions of impulsive desires not unlike the novels of pulp and noir writers. She is finding a way to tell a story of crime without resorting to old-fashioned thriller tropes and set pieces that seem lifted from cliffhanger serials. Gone are the quaint clues and girl sleuthing sequences found in her early books. Knight’s focus now is on character as opposed to multi-layered puzzling plots which is not to say that she has completely abandoned the puzzle. There is still the mystery of the pieces of the figurine of the title that will feature in the plot. But overall the story arises out of the characters’ behavior and thinking and their relationships not an artificial manipulation of events created only to bamboozle the reader.
(The above is a slightly edited portion from a longer essay on Kathleen Moore Knight I wrote for issue #68 of Geoff Bradley's fine journal Crime and Detective Stories (CADS). The issue will be coming out in a few months.)
This sounds absolutely wonderful and unexpected John. Not actually an author I'm familiar with (well, i always say that here at Pretty Sinister - lucky me!) - I really want to get this one. Would a comparison with Millar be fair perhaps?
ReplyDeleteMillar is more sophisticated than Knight who still has a tendency to drift into melodramatic excess even in the best of her books. But of all of Knight's mysteries I've read this one is a real departure for her. It was fascinating to read her work in chronological order. You could see definite growth and maturity the more she wrote and by the 1950s she is also experimenting with narrative structure (allowing the reader to follow the murderer's thoughts, for example, in Death Goes to a Reunion) and characterization as in this book. Now I have to find her books she wrote under the pseudonym "Alan Amos." She's truly one of the underappreciated, if not utterly forgotten, among the GAD era American mystery writers.
DeleteOkay, sounds interesting, John. I like the cover too. I've never read a mystery set in this milieu - as it were. :) But Troy Bannister should have been the murder victim. Nobody likes an unpleasant love-addled lady in distress.
ReplyDeleteJohn, I've seen several of Knight's books in the last few years, but haven't been drawn to actually bring one home with me. I was absolutely unfamiliar with her and the hardback reprint editions (no dust jackets) gave no clues to what type of mystery lurked inside. I think I may have to grab up the next one I see.
ReplyDelete