Then two murders occur within hours of one another -- one victim is Ford, the other is an artists' model and Heath's mistress. Could the two deaths be related to the stock scheme? Or is it purely coincidence the two were killed on the same night? And how does the strange disfigured man known as "the scarecrow" figure into the story? Is he really the son of old man Kendall? Or an impostor eager to get his hands on the Kendall's money?
The story is all about self-interest. Money and sex as in most noir thrillers are the motivations. Lt. Joe Dickerson enters the picture as a consultant to the Connecticut State Police and is sickened by the venal people he encounters. Tessie Morgan, who is manipulating most of the men characters, is typical of the murder victims in this subgenre. A go-getter who plies her sexual allure in order to get what she wants but often fails miserably. Dickerson must uncover the multiple relationships both business and sexual she has developed in order to ferret out the reason for her savage murder. While Goldthwaite does rely too heavily on stereotypes of melodramatic crime fiction he also manages nicely with the detective novel aspects of the book.
Dickerson has a knack for reconstructing the crime based on physical and circumstantial evidence. There are two impressive bits of business -- one lengthy scene in which Dickerson and his police colleagues reenact the possible ways Ford Sheppard was shot. By opening and closing a car door in variation the policemen discover the killer must be left handed. The other sequence finds Dickerson, by using only the dimensions of some holes found in the ground near the scene of Tessie's stabbing murder, fabricating a model of the murder weapon. It serves as the major clue in locating the actual missing murder weapon which is cleverly hidden in Tessie's apartment.
The motley supporting cast are not without some finely drawn and original spins on the usual stock characters. There is the bank teller Harold Finch, a Casper Milquetoast type who turns out to be less than honest. Finch is more than eager to rat on those who wronged him when Dickerson starts to threaten him with arrest for some shady dealings with the contents of Ford Sheppard's security box. Two of the characters helping out Dickerson with the investigation have a knack for criminology. Dr. Swayle, the coroner, dabbles in ballistics in addition to performing autopsies and his knowledge of guns and bullets help solve a few puzzling aspects of one murder while Julian Martens enjoys studying the psychological motivations of criminals and helps shed light on how the two murders might be linked.
Eventually the two plot lines mentioned above converge culminating in a harrowing chase, a shootout on a train trestle bridge and a revelation of the least likely suspect as murderer. This was a refreshing surprise of a detective novel that mixes both the hard edged characters usually found in noir crime fiction with the intriguing and imaginative crime solving of the "Transcendent Detective" of the Golden Age. Goldthwaite veered away from traditional detective fiction favoring hardboiled crime stories in his later career. Scarecrow, only his third mystery novel, is well worth tracking down for what appears to be the transition novel in Eaton Goldthwaite's detour from pure detective novel to noir thriller.
* * *
Reading Challenge update: Golden Age card, space E3 - "Book published same year as birth year of loved one." My sister was born in 1945.
This mixing of Noir and GAD really appeals to me John - thanks chumm shall be scouring the interweb for copies very shortly.
ReplyDeleteSounds pretty good, John Never heard of the author - no big surprise there. :) I love Dell mapbacks - why don't they still do that? I'm dreaming, I know. I do like the 'least likely person' school of murder mysteries. Don't know about the mixing of genres here, I'm not big on noir, but if you liked it, I might too.
ReplyDelete"....revelation of the least likely suspect as murderer."
ReplyDeleteIsn't this a massive spoiler ?
Not by my definition. the concept of a "least likely suspect" is all a perception issue anyway. My idea of least likely suspect in this book is not going to be everyone's idea. l would think to most people this *entire post* is a "massive spoiler" and I think that's why a lot of people no longer visit my blog. My approach is to pull out the most interesting points to entice you to read the book ---if it's worth reading. If it's not worth reading I have no problem giving away all the supposed surprises and twists. But Scarecrow is definitely worth reading and there's plenty to the plot that has not been spoiled.
DeleteJust ordered it - thanks John.
DeleteI've never heard of this author, but obviously should've. Many thanks for the headsup!
ReplyDeleteCool, great review!
ReplyDeleteEaton was my Dad. He died quite some time ago although would be thrilled readers and enthusiasts are continuing to review his work. He was a great story teller, written and orally. He was quite the cocktail party charmer back in the day. He grew up and spent much of his life as a newspaper man. If you're ever in the neighborhood, Boston University Library has a portion of his work in their archives.
Enjoy!
Thanks so much for the comment, Flora! One of the delights of writing these articles on forgotten writers and their work is the occasional fortuitous meeting (if only a digital meeting) of the writer's relatives. Appreciate these tidbits on your father!
Delete